Gathering # 2: "It's all good."
With a number of potential members again unavailable, we had another small gathering, but last week's trio grow to a quartet when Joe B. made it out to Rich's place for gathering number two. And what a gathering it was!
This was hardcore fun. We killed an hour or two just hanging out and eating great italian food before we even read a thing. When we finally got down to "business," nothing disappointed. Joe led things off with pieces from a great manuscript of fantasy, Oz-styled writing that he brought to the table. I can't wait to hear more. The diversity and overall knowledge among the participants just blows me away. And it's all good. Rich followed up with a movie review of "Daddy Daycare" he had published in a New Jersey newspaper and if you're thinking this sounds like a dry, boring ,"thumbs up or thumbs down" assessment, you're way off. Written in a clever way and with a distinct voice, the analysis was a tremendously entertaining piece in its own right. Susanna threw a curve when she temporarily left her proposed sci-fi novel behind in favor of chapter one of "Me and the Weirdos," a humorous, personal memoir about life growing up in her quirky household. And on the subject of quirky memoirs, I rounded things out with a ludicrous ranting about the life of an obsessive, detail-oriented child when I read my essay, "Santa Claus: the Myth, My Experience With it, and How I Handled the Truth."
What I want everyone who wasn't there to know is that above and beyond the thrill of sharing our writing, it seems that these evening are really about everything that happens in between the readings. Namely, wonderfully engaging conversation, shrewd observations, and lots of laughs. The writing starts us off with thoughts to ponder and discuss, but from there we end up on 100 different tangents, espousing on all subjects. And it's all good.
We rounded out the evening with some pecan and apple pies, and if it weren't for the fact that we had to go to work the next day, we probably would have hung out all night. So whether you've got a 300-page novel or simply a list of items you need to buy at K-Mart--whatever you've got--bring it down and join the fun.

5 Comments:
Another good Wednesday. Even though one of my favorite things in the world to do is sleep, I was having such a good time that I allowed the clock to tick to midnight before I had to depart. The variety of the writing is awesome. It way beats a bunch of crappy eighth grade essays. "In this essay I will write about Victor's character trait. The trait I picked for Victor is he is determined." We've got to keep writing alive, I fear the next generation will be doomed to write only email speak. I think I'll go work on "Barbara and Tommy, who knew Tom and Jerry and the Beatles were so main?"
By
Susanna, at October 14, 2004 at 6:06 PM
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
By
Susanna, at October 14, 2004 at 6:10 PM
That post above that has been "removed by the author" was deleted because it was a duplicate comment (same as the one Sue made above it).
The "this post has been removed" nonsesne is automated blogger stuff that I can't get rid of.
By
Steve, at October 19, 2004 at 1:43 PM
...Another testament to Steve's attention to detail: the way he felt the need to inform everyone (everyone being the five or so people that actually read this blog) that there was no real information deleted, it was just a double post, and to not worry that things temporarily got out of hand, Sue got smashed and wrote something haniously hurtful to someone, then sobered up, realized what she had done and quickly ran to the computer to delete the post... of course this would all have had to have happened in the 4 minutes between posts, but... hey, details.
Anyway, if he hadn't pointed that out, we could have had oodles of fun speculating as to what really happened....
By
Paul G., at July 20, 2005 at 9:09 AM
Yeah, and Paul's post made me realize something else that bugs me. These comments have ben time-stamped, albeit with a Pacific time zone (see future blog entries for details), but the comments portions have not been date-stamped. How could anyone possibly know from reading Paul's comment above that it was offered months and months later? This comment I'm making is being made on August 5 of 2005, SIGNIFICANTLY after the original blog post. It makes it look like it was the same day, just at a different time.
By
Steve, at August 5, 2005 at 5:19 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home